DOES SB HAVE A POINT?

After receiving an extremely long comment by one of our loyal fans, i confronted the man and tis was the aftermath. Does he have a point or is he foolish...... you decide. Also, did I deserve his rant? (kind of repetitive)



DP: honestly u think im gonna read that much
SB: well i read all ur B.S. about eli suckin, u lying about hating him even after what u said last night anddddddd the fact eli is getting too much credit?
SB: please
DP: im back to hating him
SB: don't downplay eli after last night that quickly
DP: i will and am
SB: then ur uncredible and silly
DP: how
DP: true i did root for eli yesterdays, true i did root for the giants in a dyhard manner, but i still despise them
SB: because its untrue to say he's getting too much credit and if thats our opinion then thats fine but state it as your opinion and not like its a fact
DP: its true, i watched espn all day
SB: if you rooted for them at all how could you despise them?
SB: its contradictory
DP: first and 10 which is an opinionated show, said eli was more important than the d-line
SB: then you aren't listening to what they are saying on espn
DP: no it isnt
SB: and you didn't watch the game close enough
SB: lol
DP: I hate the patriots more than i hate the giants but i despise them both
SB: Eli was a large part to the giants winning the superbowl
SB: and without him playing well in those big 3rd and 4th downs, they lose
DP: hes still a fag
DP: and if the pats intercepted any of the balls they should have, and if tyree didnt make that catch ppl would be bashing him
SB: but thats the nature of the sport pearce
DP: i no
SB: they didn't pick those balls off
SB: and tyree did catch the ball
DP: im glad the giants beat the pats, but im also glad when the cardinals beat the yAnkees
SB: so thats how things come together
DP: but that doesnt change my hatred for the cardinals
SB: wat does the cards and yanks have it do with this?
DP: it proves that sometime you have to root for teams u hate to beat teams you hate more
DP: next year i still am going to pick the giants to lose every game
DP: and still bash eli
SB: ok, but if you are wriGHting about sports on a blog, if you want it to be credible at all, those are your opinions not FACTS
DP: but for one game yes, i did root for the giants
DP: they didnt supposed to be facts, its an opinion based blog
SB: but if you don't think eli deserves credit then idk who in your opinion could ever deserve credit
DP: skip bayless bases his whole career off opinions
DP: the giants d line was more important in that game
DP: i felt
DP: thats all i meAnt
SB: educated opinions and non-biased
DP: if anything i am biased against the patriots
SB: but u can't give the entire d-line one mvp award
DP: there have been split mvps before
SB: claiming you hate and despise both is bias both ways
SB: not spLIt 5 ways lol
DP: which is perfect, look at tommy hienshon or when i even call uri games
DP: thats the personality that i use, and it works for people, if you didn't have people like me, u would have no disagreement in sports commentary
SB: listen i'm just saying that i understand you dislike particular players and teams but to write and talk opinion undermining them is uncredible and has no value
DP: u commenting on my blog, against me, means my opinion worked well enough to get a response
SB: thats cause i know you and i'll support your blog
DP: barstool does that too
SB: but if i read that on someone elses i'd think your bias, silly and uncredible
DP: im not credible im in college and basically a superfan
SB: don't based how u write and think on those
DP: so credibility means nothing
SB: why wouldn't you just want to mix your opinons with factual reality
SB: credibilty means everything
SB: if you write with a false sense of reality no one listens
DP: u did
DP: thats what me and bob decided what we wanted to do
SB: at what part?
DP: u have have to have opinions in sports that arnt completely factual that is how espn survives
SB: but their opinons are predictions
DP: FACT: eli's pass to asante was not a good pass
SB: or unbiased arguments
DP: FACT: every commentator mostly said the patriots were going to win
DP: Fact: 72 dolphins had extremely bias opinion and they are on espn more than anyone
SB: so eli doesn't deserve the credit because he threw 2/3 bad passes?
SB: yeah and the espn commentaters said they were annoying people but still gave them unbiases credit
DP: ur being opinionated and biased now
SB: i'm being critical
DP: fag
SB: and i have backup to what i'm saying lol
DP: nah giants are gay
DP: and sheli shucks
DP: sucks
SB: lol now ur just tryin to get under my skin lol
DP: well its true

also, Mack tell me what you think of the Gasol trade?